Welcome to the website of ME 274 for the Fall 2008 semester. On this site you can view blog posts, add your own blog posts and add comments to existing posts. In addition to the blog are links to course material: course information, information on solution videos, exams, quizzes, homeworks and other course-related material. Direct links to the homework solution videos are also available on the left side of this page.


The following is a reverse chronological order listing of the posts for the course blog. To add a post, click here (when adding posts, be sure to add a "label" in the box at the lower right side of the post window). To add a comment to an existing post, click on the "Comments" link below the post.


____________________________________________________

Feb 24, 2008

3/160

I've been working on this problem and I understand the basic kinetics of it ok, but when it comes to the kinematics of it I get a little thrown off.  I know I need to use a relative velocity equation to find the velocity of v_b and i think it should be v_b=v_a + v_b/a but how do i find v_b and v_b/a in this instance?

9 comments:

dpinto said...

You really don't need any of that. What is important is for you to know what is happening at both instants t1 and t2. It would be best to follow Prof. Krousgrill's advice to select the whole link as your system, that way it is much easier.

You should see that only gravity is acting on the system, thus there is no U(nc) term. At t1 A and B have no kinetic energy but have gravitational potential energy. At time t2 if you notice well you'll see that all the potential energy has become kinetic energy. One thing to note is that at t2 vb is ZERO, can you see why?

dpinto said...

One more thing, can someone confirm v_a = 5.29 m/s? ThAnKs!

Emily said...

Va is not 5.29 m/s . It should be 2.3 m/s. If you can write out your equations in here I can try and help you out.

dpinto said...

Emily you're right the answer is 2.3 m/s. I got 5.29 m/s because I forgot to take the square root :S. Thanks a ton for the reply and for offering to help ;).

Emily said...

You're welcome! Glad it worked out!

John said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
John said...

Nevermind, copied some dimensions wrong on my figure.

Purdue FSAE said...

I wasn't sure what to use for the height values. Do we just measure our h from where we drew the datum?

CMK said...

Yes, that is correct. Be sure to correctly account for the sign: if below the datum line, V is negative at that position, and if above the datum line, V is positive at that position.

My suggestion on this one is to put the datum line through O and use this line for both A and B (simpler trig that way).