Welcome to the website of ME 274 for the Fall 2008 semester. On this site you can view blog posts, add your own blog posts and add comments to existing posts. In addition to the blog are links to course material: course information, information on solution videos, exams, quizzes, homeworks and other course-related material. Direct links to the homework solution videos are also available on the left side of this page.


The following is a reverse chronological order listing of the posts for the course blog. To add a post, click here (when adding posts, be sure to add a "label" in the box at the lower right side of the post window). To add a comment to an existing post, click on the "Comments" link below the post.


____________________________________________________

Jun 11, 2008

Problem 2/201




I am having some problems with the first problem (2/201)

first I tried to break all of the numbers into the relative velocity vectors and obtained the following.

Vb = 60 i
Va = Va (cos 20 i + sin 20 j)
Va/b = Va/b( cos (theta) i + sin (theta) j)

Then i tried to break up these equations and make an i equation and a j equation based on
Va = Vb - Va/b

this yielded
60i = Va cos 20 i + Va/b cos (theta) i
0 = Va (sin (20) j +Va/b sin (theta) j

From here I was left with three variables and two equations... am I missing something?

6 comments:

ckearney said...

at a glance, all i noticed was that your relative v equation wasn't quite right.

try:
Va/b = Va - Vb

ckearney said...

in addition to what i said before.. since you are using the angle with the x-axis for Va, "theta" should be 30. i'm not sure if your work comes out right, but if you drew your V vector triangle right, it should work.

CMK said...

An important point in this problem is that, since the tow rope does not stretch, the velocity of A relative to B must be perpendicular to the rope. Therefore, the direction of the relative velocity vector v_A/B has x-y components as shown in the figure (I attached a figure to the original post.)

Therefore, the direction of v_A/B is known in terms of the angle theta as shown.

Let me know if this does not help.

ckearney said...

i understand that the picture is not necessarily to scale, but shouldn't Va/b be the vector difference Va - Vb? if that's the case, it seems to me Va/b would not be perpendicular to the rope.

can you explain in a different way why Va/b must be perpendicular to the rope (maybe in class)?

CMK said...

There are a couple arguments that can be made.

One way is to have a polar coordinate system corresponding to someone at the rear of B watching A: e_r points toward A away from B and e_theta is perpendicular to the rope. Let R be the length of the tow rope. If we are able to assume that the rope does not go slack, then the distance R between A and B cannot change. Therefore, R_dot = 0, and as a result v_A/B has only a component in e_theta which is perpendicular to the tow ropes. (This is a good perspective to use since the second part of the question asks for theta_dot -- this comes directly from the polar coordinate perspective.)

From a slightly different perspective. Imagine yourself on boat B watching A. You cannot observe any motion of A directly toward you; otherwise the rope goes slack. Therefore the only motion that you see of A must be perpendicular to the tow rope.

I see your point in that it is hard to see that v_A - v_B is perpendicular to the rope (since the scale of my drawing is not great). Once you get your final answer, draw an accurate figure. It will make sense then, I think.

Good way to check things out -- make sure that all of this makes sense before moving on. Ask about this in the problem-solving session on Friday.

ckearney said...

thank you, i think it's clear now.