

Welcome to the website of ME 274 for the Fall 2008 semester. On this site you can view blog posts, add your own blog posts and add comments to existing posts. In addition to the blog are links to course material: course information, information on solution videos, exams, quizzes, homeworks and other course-related material. Direct links to the homework solution videos are also available on the left side of this page.
The following is a reverse chronological order listing of the posts for the course blog. To add a post, click here (when adding posts, be sure to add a "label" in the box at the lower right side of the post window). To add a comment to an existing post, click on the "Comments" link below the post.
____________________________________________________
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comments:
For my moment equation, I used the radius of G as r and the radius of the whole wheel as R, and go the equation: N*R+f*r=iG*alpha+m*rG/O x aG
Does that seem correct?
I think N acts at the 40mm, which i think your calling r not R, so you should switch your R's.
does that make sense? Force N acts along Y-axis 40mm away from G, so the moment is N*r
I am unable to find the answer, and my thought process has been this thus far:
(1) sum_Fx = F = m*a_Gx (F is friction)
(2) sum_Fy = N - mg = m*a_Gy
(3) sum_MG = N(.04) + F(.1) = I_G*alpha
For kinematics I used G/O, O/C and C/G to find relations between a_Gx, a_Gy and alpha. With these relations I solved for alpha using (3) and then (1) and (2) to find the unknown N and F. Is this process correct?
Your equation 3) is off due to the fact that there is an acceleration at G. So your eq 3 should be
(3) sum_MG = N(.04) + F(.1) = I_G*alpha + m*rG/O x aG
If you follow the kinematics steps that the professor outlined, you should get the right overall answer.
byron,
there is an acceleration in G, but it's still just I*alpha because since you're summing the moments about G and not the moments about O, you would use rG/G, not rG/O, which is zero. The r is from whatever point you're summing the moment about to the center of gravity G, so if you're doing it at G, rG/G is zero.
Did you use rG/O and get the right answer?
nvm, it's odd, so the answers not in the book. I'm pretty sure what I said is still right though.
Ah, that's right, thanks. I'm used to G being the center of the uniform mass.
FYI, the answers for this problem are:
N = normal force = 87.7 newtons
f = friction force = 24.4 newtons (to left)
For the FBD on this problem, it has a counter clockwise moment. Why would this not produce a friction force in the -x direction, opposite of what you have shown
The direction of the friction force changes as the disk rolls; half of the time it acts to the left and the other half it acts to the right (see the animation for the problem that is posted on the blog).
Since we never set friction = mu*N, we can arbitrarily draw in the direction of friction. The mathematics will take care of the sign.
Good question.
Post a Comment